After coercing/convincing his girlfriend and her friends/coworkers to accompany him to an island resort, the group’s vacation is cut short by the dual threats of a powerful hurricane and an undead shark making an army of zombie sharks. Obviously, this is low budget and schlocky with usually spotty special effects. That isn’t necessarily a deal breaker for me though, because the hammy performances, absurd shark attack sequences, and barebones setpieces provide more than enough charm. This movie was clearly made by a couple people with more gumption than sense and I have to applaud them because that is the backbone of indie filmmaking and why I love the genre so much. Also, this is an entry in the seemingly endless ocean of Z grade shark movies, Zombie Shark represents something intensely nostalgic for me. I’ve shared dozens upon dozens of terrible shark movies with friends, family, and loved ones, and while Zombie Shark isn’t a masterpiece, it remains a fun time that is certainly worth a beer and riffing night. Finally, good job to whoever demanded this movie be retitled Zombie Shark, it’s a way better title than Shark Island. Maybe it would have been a good idea to replace the ‘Shark Island’ title card with a ‘Zombie Shark’ title card though, because when that Shark Island title card came up I was concerned I got catfished. Catsharked? Sharkfished? Anyway, thanks for joining me for the first day of Spooktober!
Category: Halloween Spooktacular
Halloween Roundup! Five Nights at Freddy’s, The Exorcist: Believer, The Nun II
Halloween Roundup
Five Nights At Freddy’s
The Exorcist: Believer
The Nun II
Usually, I only group movies together like this when they’re part of the same series or if there is some special theme linking them all together, which this group doesn’t really have. Unless you count ‘being bad’ as a theme, which, whatever, let’s go with that! The theme here is bad movies that I saw recently which also happen to be horror movies released near Halloween! That’s kind of a spoiler, but what did you expect? Did you think the Five Nights at Freddy’s movie was going to be awesome? That the Exorcist revival brought to us by the guy who brought back the Halloween franchise and then spent years re-killing it was going to capture the magic of the original? That The Nun II has any reason to exist? Might as well get started on these.
Continue reading…A Haunting in Venice
A Haunting in Venice (2023)
Directed by Kenneth Branagh
Happy Spooktober to you, friends! It’s been a while and I’m joyful to be writing again, especially now, the spookiest time of the year. For my first review of the season, I saw the newest film in the Poirot series, A Haunting in Venice. I’m not overly familiar with Poirot, I’ve only seen the recent Murder on the Orient Express and haven’t read any of the books, but I generally like Kenneth Branagh and I can’t say no to a spooky period piece, so I checked it out. Right after seeing this I also went to Six Flags for Frightfest, which isn’t related at all but I just wanted to mention it in case anyone wants to talk about Frightfest. Please, I’m begging you. Anyway, A Haunting in Venice!
Continue reading…Lamb
Lamb (2021)
Directed by Valdimar Jóhannsson
One of the first Icelandic horror movies I’ve seen, Lamb came stateside courtesy of A24, every film nerd’s favorite artsy film producers. I’ve been looking forward to Lamb for a long time, its trailer was phenomenal with a premise that tickled my body horror loving heart; on a farm in Iceland a couple finds that one of their sheep has given birth to an odd creature, a baby with the head of a lamb but the body of a human child. Because of the weird state of theaters right now, and how busy I am generally, I almost wasn’t able to see this in a theater, but luckily I managed to sneak in at the last moment and see it before it went streaming. My experience was unfortunately a tad bittersweet though. I was happy I got to see it in the theater, but this is the first A24 movie that left me kind of disappointed.
That’s not to say Lamb is a bad movie. There’s a lot about it that works, good cinematography, great performances from the leads, Noomi Rapace and Hilmir Snær Guðnason, a great premise, and an ending that I liked the concept of quite a lot. Lamb plays much more like a modern fantasy film with a dark edge than a horror movie, and while I appreciate the courage it takes to make a non-standard modern fantasy, Lamb was 100% marketed as a horror movie. There is a lot of atmosphere present and Lamb does make for a mesmerizing and kind of spooky viewing, but not nearly enough happens for my taste. If you’re really into other A24 releases then you may get more out of Lamb than I did, but most others probably won’t get too much out of Lamb. This is coming to VoD soon but if anything I said above makes you iffy then give it a pass or wait for it to hit a streaming service you’re already subscribed to.
The Poughkeepsie Tapes
Directed by John Erick Dowdle
True Crime is huge these days. I don’t personally understand the appeal, but loads of people love listening to podcasts about real people committing real atrocities on hapless victims. Sure, Jason hacks people up with a machete and Michael Myers has his infamous kitchen knife, but there’s always that element of cartoonishness that separates slasher movies from real life serial killers. That element, and the line that separates slashers and serial killers, is blurred expertly by The Poughkeepsie Tapes, a found footage movie about a fictional serial killer operating in the Poughkeepsie area. Presented as a documentary, this film blends segments of reporters, FBI personnel, and local law enforcement with footage found to have been filmed by the killer. I think this goes without saying The Poughkeepsie Tapes is an excessively triggering movie, and the level of violence, depravity, and straight up cruelty is pretty sick.
That all being said, The Poughkeepsie Tapes is never as graphic as I was thinking it might be. There are moments of extreme violence and cruelty, but the sheer levels of depravity and evil that this film is capable of are smartly offscreen, alluded to by interviewees or seen after the fact. This helps keep the gritty realism that’s key to The Poughkeepsie Tapes’ success, even when kind of absurd things are happening on-screen there’s always that pull back that keeps things grounded. Unfortunately, there are moments when this reality begins to crumble, this may be more obvious to people who are really into True Crime but even I was able to catch some things that were definitely incorrect about procedure, particularly the ‘you need to wait 24 hours to report someone missing’ thing that gets brought up in the silliest way possible. Those moments weren’t enough to keep me out though as the quality performances and disturbing imagery more than made up for these flubs. I would recommend The Poughkeepsie Tapes so long as you know what you are getting into. This movie is cruel, disgusting, and vile, but it was the change of pace I needed from all the middle of the road stuff I’ve seen lately.
Grave Halloween
Grave Halloween (2013)
Directed by Steven R. Monroe
More than a decade after she’s sent away from her home country of Japan and adopted, Maiko takes a trip out to the famous Aokigahara Forest, also known as the Suicide Forest for you non-weebs, to try to find the site where her mother killed herself, and bring her spirit to rest. Joining her is her cadre of friends from the Yamanashi International University, who are there so this story explicitly set in Japan and concerning Japanese spiritual customs can have a mostly white cast, that all join Maiko so they can turn her personal tragic story into a good grade for a video project they’re making for class. What’s the project about? Why would the professor accept this given that filming in the Suicide Forest is illegal? Why would Maiko agree to put her personal trauma on display for this video? Here’s an answer for you; so the movie could happen. Anyway, it’s very important for Maiko to complete a segaki, which is a really real Buddhist ritual that calms the restless dead, and Maiko is determined to finish it this year, as coincidentally the ritual takes place on Halloween night this year.
Unless you’ve already googled this and spoiled the surprise, which anyone can do and could have done at the time, I bet you’re wondering if the annual segaki ritual fell on October 31st that year. The answer is no. Interestingly, the segaki ritual can be performed at any time during the year, but there is a special annual ritual held, typically between the end of July and the beginning of September. There is no connection whatsoever between this and Halloween, and Halloween is mentioned maybe once in this movie, just so they could put it in the title and have this movie come up when well meaning lovers of Halloween horror type in ‘Halloween’ on a streaming site. It is a blatant lie told by desperate filmmakers to try to dishonestly get views on a movie no one would want to watch for any other reason. It’s downright disrespectful, which is ironic given that the plot of the movie is about disrespecting the dead in the Suicide Forest.
But I can understand why they would want to trick people, because Grave Halloween has nothing else going for it except ripping off better horror movies. They’re lost in the creepy shifting woods so it’s like the Blair Witch Project but shittier. There’s invisible monsters and vine-like things attacking you, so it’s like the Evil Dead but shittier. There’s a spooky mystery involving a creepy long haired ghost so it’s like a lot of Japanese horror movies but shittier. The only thing Grave Halloween has going for it is that it is prime riffing material, the kind of movie that you can heckle and throw beer bottles at the screen (preferably if you’re projecting it on a wall) and feel content in the knowledge that you didn’t make this movie. To be fair, I will say two positive things about Grave Halloween. The ending plot twist is a good idea but not executed properly, and also the actors are all trying their best but can’t get past the awful lines they’re forced to read. These people all deserved better than Grave Halloween.
Halloween Kills
Halloween Kills (2021)
Directed by David Gordon Green
Halloween Kills is, by the strictest legal definition alone, a movie. I could end this review right here, but I’ll keep going to satisfy my own need for revenge against this movie that held me captive in a theatre for what felt like three full hours. The “story” of Halloween Kills takes place mere moments after the events of 2018’s Halloween reboot, with the Strode family women riding away from the flaming wreckage of a house containing the now quite injured Michael Myers. Michael of course escapes and continues sowing havoc throughout the town, while Laurie Strode sits in a hospital bed for 90% of her screen time. People are killed. Flashbacks are had. Everyone talks about how evil Michael Myers is and how he’s terrorized this town for too long and how it’s all gonna be over now and evil dies tonight. Every single scene has some variation of that last sentence, and nothing else happens for the entirety of the runtime that advances the metaplot of the new Halloween trilogy in any meaningful way. And spoilers, but they DON’T KILL MICHAEL MYERS BECAUSE HOW COULD THEY?!? THERE’S ANOTHER MOVIE COMING OUT!
Look, we all know that 1978’s Halloween is a great movie. It revolutionized horror and is a shining beacon of what independent cinema can become. But I already knew that, and I bet you did too. So there isn’t any reason for there to be a big flashback at the beginning of Halloween Kills showing the events of 1978 but from a slightly different perspective, or for a character to explain to the camera exactly what happened that night in the scene directly thereafter, or for people to be constantly talking about what happened that night. If you’re making a point about how collective trauma can affect a town or generation then sure, that’s a reasonable sequence. You establish what happened and deep delve into the long term repercussions of one night of terror. But that isn’t what happens at all. There’s one sequence in the movie where it seems like they’re trying to tackle an actual plot, but as quickly as it starts up, that sequence ends, without changing anything.
It may sound harsh but there isn’t any reason for Halloween Kills to exist. It feels more like a fan film made by a millionaire than any kind of addition to the Halloween canon, and I know at this point that there have been a lot of movies in the Halloween series that weren’t very good, but Halloween 2018 erased them! You got rid of all the bad ones (and some good ones), so why are you adding more bad movies to the series? If you don’t have an idea for what’s supposed to happen between the reboot and the ending of the Laurie Strode-Michael Myers saga, then how about you just make two movies, one that reestablishes the characters, and one that dives deep and finishes off the plot. Halloween Kills exists only to take your money and that makes me mad, and it should make YOU mad.
Viy
Viy (1967)
Directed by Konstantin Yershov & Georgi Kropachyov
When a seminary in Kiev lets the rambunctious students out for a vacation, they waste no time in getting into all sorts of mischief in town as they scatter to the four winds. A few of these students end up at an old farmhouse, beseeching the elderly farmer for food and shelter, offering spiritual rewards for these services. After a series of bizarre happenings at the farmhouse, the holy man in training, Khoma, flees into night, returning to his seminary but called back by a wealthy noble who reveals that his daughter’s dying wish was to have Khoma, who she mentioned by name, watch over her dead body and pray for her for three nights. Leaning more towards dark fantasy or fairy tale than pure horror, this is nonetheless a fascinating film, reportedly the first Soviet horror movie produced!
I had heard very little about Viy, picking it on a whim for its short length more than anything, and I was surprised by exactly how perfect this is for a spooky watch! Many of Viy’s effects are dated, which is to be expected considering it is more than fifty years old, but there’s an ambition to Viy that’s so charming I can’t help but love even the janky looking rear screen projections. Viy drips with imagination and eagerness, an earnest attempt to tell a story that’s half morality play and half campfire tale, one that kept me guessing as to what wild thing I was going to see next and delighted me with its strangeness. Sure, the dub is meh and the story is very simple, but Viy has a sense of wonder and fun that fans of strange cinema will enjoy.
The Batman vs. Dracula
The Batman vs. Dracula (2005)
Directed by Michael Goguen
After a wild and crazy weekend of partying I decided to take a relaxing day to tone things down and go with some lighter fare. I started out watching Casper: A Spirited Beginning, but that was so unrelentingly dull and formulaic that I can’t even bring myself to spend any more brain-power to make fun of it, and I wound up taking a look at The Batman vs. Dracula. I’ve been a fan of a lot of the animated Batman content I’ve seen, Batman: The Animated Series is a classic, and Batman Beyond is an underappreciated gem, but I wasn’t too familiar with The Batman, which was admittedly a little after my time. Maybe I should go back and give it a chance, because The Batman vs. Dracula was surprisingly good.
It’s always convenient when the title of a thing describes the plot completely, and that’s exactly what happens here; Dracula is awoken in Gotham City and Batman has to fight him. Sure, there’s a little plot about Dracula turning people into vampire slaves, and a bit at the beginning with Joker and Penguin, but the meat of this is that Batman has to fight Dracula, and all of that works for me. I always enjoy Bat-media that embraces Batman’s weird adversaries, and Dracula fits pretty well with the whole Bat-mythos, providing a neat villain that has some fun fights, even with a predictable conclusion. Generally, the visuals here are fine, nothing groundbreaking but not a bad faux-gothic look, and this did get a lot more gruesome than I was expecting, which is a big plus. Overall this is a breezy and fun Batman adventure that hits all the basic notes without being spectacular. One thing I will say though, what the hell is up with this Joker design? I have to include a picture of it here because this is probably the worst depiction of the Joker, who also is a martial arts expert for some reason.
Cannibal Troll
Cannibal Troll (2021)
Directed by Scott Jeffrey
I was talking to my wife about the movies I watched recently and Cannibal Troll came up, without missing a beat she said, “Oh so he’s a troll who eats other trolls?” That sounds interesting to me, a horror movie where all the characters are trolls and there’s one particularly evil one who targets the other trolls, like a fantasy Hannibal Lecter, but sadly no, that is not the case. Not only does the Troll in Cannibal Troll never eat another troll, we never even get confirmation that he even eats people. It’s implied in a few scenes but never outright stated, which is really strange but it’s just one minor fraction of what makes Cannibal Troll such a bizarre movie. Cannibal Troll opens the way all great horror movies do, by immediately showing the villain, explaining what the villain’s shtick is, showing us all his lovely cottage in the woods, and then introducing us to a character who knows exactly what’s happening and exactly how to defeat the troll but who never acts on this knowledge.That all happens in the first scene of the movie and I can already feel my mind breaking just trying to explain this movie and I haven’t even made it to the premise yet!
A group of young women head out to the woods for a fun camping trip for the main gal’s ‘hen-do’, British for Bachelorette Party, when they encounter a suspicious priest in a church in the middle of nowhere, who knows exactly what is going on but refuses to give details other than standard vague horror movie warnings, before heading out on their hiking trip. Let me break this group down for you, the bride to be is going on a camping/hiking trip with; her own mother, a friend who is heavily pregnant, her best friend who is secretly in love with her (spoilers), and then some people who have no characters and don’t matter. You’re probably thinking that this group is ready for some character drama, right? WRONG. There are exactly two scenes where ANY character drama happens, two scenes where stuff matters and people talk about it. What is in this movie you may ask? Running. Running in the woods. Running from a troll. Running to go back to the troll’s cottage to get keys. Running while the troll is shooting arrows at them, arrows that clearly don’t have arrowheads on them but still kill people by the way, running while the troll slowly chases them.
While they’re running there is also a ton of dialogue, but none of it ever matters even slightly. Plot points are brought up and then never explained, the troll’s motivations get discussed but never get confirmed or even elaborated on, so this mythology is built around the troll that you would never learn from the movie without someone explaining it to you. We never learn where the other trolls are or if there is only one troll or if the other trolls are just living somewhere else. This is the part that makes the movie shine for me. If it was only running, then I would be bored the whole time, but because the actual plot of the movie is getting shuffled around, my constant confusion kept me engaged. I desperately wanted answers. I wanted to know why, but Cannibal Troll refused to explain anything to me, and I kind of admire that. Others probably won’t get much out of Cannibal Troll, but it stubbornly refuses to act like a real movie, and that’s kind of charming in a weird way.
Recent Comments